The Case Against Digital Maximalism in Asian Healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23434/Keywords:
digital health; digital maximalism; digital frugality; clinician burnout; cognitive overload; human-centered design; health policy; AsiaAbstract
Digital technology is now inseparable from medical practice, and Asia stands at the center of this transformation. Yet the prevailing response to healthcare challenges has been the uncritical addition of digital tools — a pattern I call digital maximalism. Digital maximalism produces cognitive overload, alert fatigue, and clinician burnout without proportionate gains in care. Good design, while necessary, cannot address the cumulative burden of many tools; the problem is one of quantity as well as quality. I propose digital frugality — the deliberate, disciplined use of technology, and the deliberate removal of what does not serve the patient — as a corrective. Asia must chart a different course from Western models, given deep disparities in infrastructure and literacy, and raises unresolved policy questions on tariffs, insurance, platform architecture, service units, and accountability.
Downloads
References
Tzimourta KD. Human-Centered Design and Development in Digital Health: Approaches, Challenges, and Emerging Trends. Cureus. 2025;17(6):e85897.
Ruotsalainen P, Blobel B. A System Model and Requirements for Transformation to Human-Centric Digital Health. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e68661.
Bagheri Lankarani K, Mehrabi M. The Philosophy of Design in m-Health: Balancing Wisdom, Ethics, and User Needs. Shiraz E-Medical Journal. 2025;26(7):e163527.
Bagheri Lankarani K, Khayamzadeh M, Taghdisi M. Transition from Treatment-Based to Health-Based Insurance by Learning from Global Experiences. Iranian Journal of Culture and Health Promotion. 2025;9(3):307-10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asian Digital Health and Culture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

